I have super fast midi response in my setup too talking to all my hardware machines. I am a drummer and got a heightened sense of timing and hearing things hitting in the right spot is very important to me. For me that is worth much more than midi features. (my midi interface being is on the serial buss too the midi timing is perfect no matter what is going on the audio side.) It beats Sonar by a long shot. I found the midi timing in Sonar to be less predictable and less tight especially when the audio side of the program is under load. Often the hardware will have multiple pairs of stereo outputs too, making further patching to analog mixers and finer processing possible. I tend to only assign any single hardware device a max of 4 presets at once. You never have issues with sounds overlapping or cutting off this way. I put the synth into multi timbral mode and set up multiple presets that way, just receiving on their own channel. When I am expecting a single hardware device to handle multiple presets, I dont even get into program changes in this situation. Use your midi editors and librarians in standalone mode. I can easily audition sounds while Studio One is at rest. I find I can still use all the librarians with most of my hardware synths with these programs running in tandem with Studio One. (Any DAW and computer will have some issues dumping large amounts of Sysex data to hardware while on the fly. I like to edit the hardware presets to suit the music. It is just a matter of setting up presets or groups of presets for the pieces you are working on. I tend to think of each hardware device as an entity on its own. I am not so concerned about how Studio One handles Sysex data on the fly during sequences and things. You can edit the music around just as much as audio files, you can edit all aspects of performances, eg timing, velocity. It is rock solid especially with external hardware. I've searched everywhere to find users that have used MidiQuest as a VST with StudioOne, but so far no one seems to know how to make it work.ĭo you think It's time to bite the bullet and go back to Sonar, or does someone here know how to make it work?ĭid you read this thread it has some interesting stuff in it regarding Studio One and Midi:įor me Midi in Studio One was one of the main reasons I switched to it. I've also seen a bit of hostility towards hard synth users as well as a Presonus lack of wanting to add more midi features. I don't know if I can return the software (probably not) but my question to everyone is, should I invest more time with the product.įrom what I've seen on the web, and especially in these forums, is that StudioOne was never made for midi. My main source of sounds come from 5 hardware synths.Īfter weeks of trying to automate a process, using MidiQuest as a VST, I have failed. I've now invested a lot of time and money upgrading to the pro version. I finally decided that this is a great product especially combined with the software ties to the hardware. I started looking on the net and asking a questions including pre sales phone and this forum. I searched around and decided that it was the best mixer for the money.įor the heck of it, I tried the free Artist software and I was impressed. When I spoke to my sales rep of 15+ years at FullCompass, he advised me to get the the Presonus 24 track AI mixer. I was going to get the Tascam digital mixer. I decided to upgrade my studio with a digital board. I have always used Sonar from cakewalk 4.x to the present, Sonas X3.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |